• Probius@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    19 hours ago

    To me, what makes the difference is whether or not it’s trained on other people’s shit. The distinction between AI and an algorithm is pretty arbitrary, but I wouldn’t consider, for example, procedural generation via the wave function collapse algorithm to have the same moral implications as selling something using what most people would call AI-generated content.

    • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      And if you train an open source model yourself so it can generate content specifically on work you’ve created? Or are you against certain Linux devices too?

      • Probius@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t have a problem with games creating their own models trained only on things they created. I believe charging money for anything using assets generated by a model trained on data they didn’t have the rights to should be illegal. If a model is trained on data that they do own the the rights to, but didn’t create, that’s a weird gray area where I think it shouldn’t be illegal to sell its results, but you should have to disclose that you used it.