• zalack@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Teleporters are interesting because when you think about it long enough, you realize the person on departure end died.

    Then you think about it more, and if the person that comes out the arrival end is an exact replica, down to the atom, and has continuity of thought… if you accept that they died then you kind of also have to accept that the “you” of any given instant is constantly dying and giving way to the “you” of the next instant. That person living that experience at that exact moment will never exist again.

    So then you’re kinda back to transporters being business as usual again, but with a fun new existential crisis on the side.

    • SeeJayEmm@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      In practice, I agree with you. The transporter scans, disintegrates, and reconstructs the thing being transported. But when the thing being transported is reconstructed at a subatomic level it is effectively identical.

      I can imagine the society we see in startrek having already worked through the moral and philosophical implications. I would have loved to see that addressed in an episode tho.

      • concrete_baby@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Is one carbon atom the same as another carbon atom, philosophically? Can you keep your identity when all your atoms are replaced by other atoms of the same kind? It’s the ship of Theseus problem

      • taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The real question is why they wouldn’t use the transporter buffers effectively as backups for away teams. Have an away team member killed? No problem, rematerialize them from the buffer.