erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agogender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1807arrow-down112 cross-posted to: flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up1795arrow-down1imagegender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneerotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square53fedilink cross-posted to: flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squareRachelhazideas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·1 day agoMake the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
minus-squareBorgDrone@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoOr just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·22 hours agobut could female humans be called femaleman?
minus-squareporous_grey_matter@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoThat’s more or less what it historically was
Make the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
Or just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
but could female humans be called femaleman?
That’s more or less what it historically was