"It is not Trump—just as it was not Biden or Harris—who decides what the Palestinians can or cannot do," Abandon Harris' Hudhayfah Ahmad told Newsweek.
In that case, the best way to ensure a politician who supports a certain cause comes along is to conditionally support politicians only when they support said cause.
Yea I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t be that ok with the “slow genocide” option if your family was there, dumbass. There is something really scary thinking any human being could be that comfortable with losing every morale compass in the name of pragmatism.
The lefts goal is to stop the genocide, in either scenario, but it seems like a much harder thing to do under the latter option.
An important part of my response that you seem to have missed.
Essentially, stopping the genocide is multi-stage process, but that’s (apparently) a very complicated thing for you to understand, so instead you just gave up and accepted defeat.
And not just accepted defeat, but used that defeat to feel morally superior to those that didn’t stop fighting, that recognized that Palestinian liberation would require more than just voting in the presidential election. That voting was the just the bare minimum requirement of the task at hand.
People like you are idiots and will always share some of the responsibility for what this white-christo facist regime inflicts on the world.
The options appears to have been
Get bombed but afterwards the survivors get to stay in their homeland.
Or
Get bombed and afterwards the survivors are ethnically cleansed and their homeland becomes a US/Israel resort.
So slow genocide with open air prison vs quicker genocide?
Surviving until another more friendly politician comes around is certainly a much better option.
The best way to ensure a politician who supports a cause comes along is to support politicians unconditionally whether they support it or not.
And the people who think that genuinely think it’s the rest of us who are stupid lmao
It’s like you’re addicted to misrepresenting people’s argument
My apologies, I must have misunderstood.
In that case, the best way to ensure a politician who supports a certain cause comes along is to conditionally support politicians only when they support said cause.
Do you want the genocide that will take a century, or the genocide that will take a few weeks to months.
The lefts goal is to stop the genocide, in either scenario, but it seems like a much harder thing to do under the latter option.
Yea I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t be that ok with the “slow genocide” option if your family was there, dumbass. There is something really scary thinking any human being could be that comfortable with losing every morale compass in the name of pragmatism.
An important part of my response that you seem to have missed.
Essentially, stopping the genocide is multi-stage process, but that’s (apparently) a very complicated thing for you to understand, so instead you just gave up and accepted defeat.
And not just accepted defeat, but used that defeat to feel morally superior to those that didn’t stop fighting, that recognized that Palestinian liberation would require more than just voting in the presidential election. That voting was the just the bare minimum requirement of the task at hand.
People like you are idiots and will always share some of the responsibility for what this white-christo facist regime inflicts on the world.
Slower means more people are alive. More time for change.