• Gointhefridge@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’d argue they’re “less worse” but the fact remains that no one becomes a billionaire without exploitation. Bill Gates owned a monopoly and I’m honestly not sure what Mark Cuban did. At some point and time you must exploit a system and it’s people to amass that much wealth.

    • ansiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Cuban is what would have happened to Musk if he basically just took his money and walked away after Paypal. Cuban sold a website to Yahoo and the deal is arguably the worst deal (for Yahoo) of the dot-com bubble.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I’ll say Bill Gates monopoly sucked, but didn’t represent anything like Amazon warehouse conditions or generally other terribly exploitative behaviors. He basically won the lottery of being in the right spot in a tech industry to be the benefeciary of a lot of money being freely thrown at him without him having to resort to typical billionaire measures. Sounds similar for Mark Cuban.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        No, he didn’t “win the lottery”. He was a monopolist who engaged in anti-competitive behavior for years. Went to court and everything, case closed.

        He can’t donate more than the total he stole and destroyed by deadweight loss.