Personally, I want nothing to do with them and I’m not willing to give them the benefit of the doubt. I moved to the Fediverse to get away from all these corpos.

  • Jure Repinc@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Judging from their past and all the bad actions they have done in the past, bad for democracy, privacy, minorities and marginalised people and how openly they have a far/extreme-right bias. Well I feel extremely negative about them joining in. They were also part of destruction of another open/federated protocol in the past: they played big part in destroying XMPP/Jabber messaging. So I am afraid they will do their usual embrace, extend, and extinguish thing and their surveillance capitalist thing and yeah. no good. Best to block their instances outright.

    • Björn Tantau@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, I was thinking of Jabber as well, when I heard this. For a brief period everything was perfect. Facebook and Google were both using Jabber. And even WhatsApp was using it, I think. So if you had an account somewhere you could actually chat with all your friends, totally unimpeded.

      EU should hurry up with their federation laws.

      • wagesj45@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        you can still use XMPP. i use it, my family uses it.

        hate facebook all you want (i certainly do) but dont act like normies would be living in a federated utopia without them. theyd be on whatever is closed source with the most number of people and the most advertising dollars behind it and the simplest user experience. normies like easy, and its hard to blame them.

          • wagesj45@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            true. but don’t forget that when these things were new, they came kicking and screaming. think of how many people retired during the PC/internet boom just so they wouldn’t have to deal with it all at work. the entire world changed and made websites/email a necessity to exist and survive. i don’t really see a minor flavor of tech like microblogging following that path. people will have an option between “easy and closed source” and “mildly just a little technical but with freedom” and will choose to go with whatever is easy.

  • t0fr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m trying to get away from Facebook and meta. I’d rather they weren’t remotely near me at all

    • axellenium@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly my thoughts, I don’t trust meta or zucky’s leadership, their motives will always be profit over everything else

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    we shouldnt let them in. they would have done decentralized service years ago if there was money in it for them. They either want us to stop or try to seize control in only way that can -> by worming in.

    We must have zero-tolerance for corporations or we might as well just give up.

    • masterspace@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We must have zero-tolerance for corporations or we might as well just give up.

      As long as servers cost money to run, corporations will need to be involved.

      At a fundamental level, it’s either

      a) run by donations as a non profit, but as we’ve seen from wikipedia it will be a constant struggle to have enough money to last indefinitely (especially since Reddit / kbin / lemmy cost a lot more to run than Wikipedia)

      b) run by subscriptions, which will greatly limit growth, reach, search engine optimization, etc.

      c) run by advertising in which case corporate ad networks (like the kind that Meta runs) will need to be involved or

      d) have instances that are government run / paid for, but it would be difficult to accomplish on a global scale and may come with restrictions that not everyone is happy with

      It sucks but those are pretty much the only four options for running a digital community that requires paid servers and hosting space. Either corporations or some large government organization are going to have to be involved.

      • JshKlsn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        About your first point, I’ve heard that Wikipedia is actually very wealthy and doesn’t need the money. They essentially run a scam every year asking for more.

        • bric@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t understand why everyone freaks out that wikipedia tries to keep a reserve. Yes, they have enough money on hand to run for a few years… Is that really such a bad thing? Why does everyone think nonprofits should be scrimping by before they do their next donation campaign?

          To me, keeping a reserve fund just seems like good money management, and I’d rather donate to an organization that manages their money well than one that doesn’t. If there were problems with a large chunk of donations not going to wikipedia upkeep it would be different, but as far as I can tell all of the controversy is just over the fact that they have a reserve at all

  • qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For myself, I’m not a fan either. But I think it could be a very good thing for the fediverse (still not a fan of that word) — which, as I understand it, is all about choice: the ability to easily access content across the fediverse, with the ability to ignore it just as easily.

    If it ends up breeding toxicity, then I’ll block any subs, and possibly the whole instance†. And if it gets really bad, I’ll just find a lemmy/mastodon/whatever instance that has defederated from them.

    † Sounds like this maybe isn’t possible yet, but is being looked at https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/2397

      • kool_newt@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        no need to preemptively block

        I think this is like a Lucy and Charlie Brown trying to kick the football situation. How many times are we going to give capitalists who have shown their true colors over and over the benefit of the doubt and be shocked when they proceed to embrace, extend, and destroy?

        It’s not a preemptive block, it’s a block based on a history of problematic actions.

        Edit: Though idk if “blocking” them from making an instance is even an option. I expect a separate island of instances not federating with for-profit instances.

  • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    They see the fediverse trend gain9ng steam with the rise of Mastodon and go “Oh sheit we need to be on that for $$$”. Proceed to embrace, extend, enshittify, and extinguish. Its nothing but Zuckerberg’s gasping breaths to try and stay relevant as his company begins the very slow, but inevitable, backslide into technological irrelevance.

    I will be leaving and/or blocking any instance that chooses to federate with anything related to Meta. They are antithetical to the entire foundation of the metaverse and they ruin everything they touch.

  • ataraxia937@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even if they were somehow not evil, the sheer volume would technologically destroy any instance that tried to federate with them.

  • JoeKrogan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    They will datamine all federated users They will set up a CDN for uploads on their platform that will track you like v.meta.com or i.meta.com.

    They will probably train LLMs off the data. They will sell the data to advertisers or data brokers. They will most likely have ads or pay to boost.

    They will diverge from the standard once they have the majority of users like google does with chrome and the web.

  • HealGirl@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lmao want nothing to do with them. One of the reasons I’m here is to escape these dogshit corpos