• Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    85
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is what happens when your view of history is essentially the historical equivalent of pop culture. You end up saying idiot things on an idiot website for idiots.

    Lots of people died in airships, the Hindenburg was the most exploding and dramatic, but it was not the first and only instance. In fact the Hindenburg was made up of parts from a previous airship that had also crashed.

    • @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      -11 month ago

      But also the technology to make rigid airships relatively safe has existed for decades and there’s no reason we can’t go back to them now except bad PR.

      • @captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        171 month ago

        And the fact that they’re only so so. Like, airplanes are just better. Once we had the ability to make cargo planes it was over

        • @freebee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          61 month ago

          Better in many regards but for sure not all. Airships could run a lot more quietly for example, that has some value. Until they explode ofcourse, that’s rather loud.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        01 month ago

        They would still have to contain hydrogen though. Making them rigid doesn’t decrease fire risk.

        They have bad PR for a reason. It’s not prejudice it’s practicality.

            • @bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              01 month ago

              That hasn’t stopped billionaires from building spaceships or submarines. All I’m saying is that we would absolutely see some weird eccentric billionaires building and riding in zeppelins if it weren’t for the bad PR of the Hindenburg.