True, and it makes me trust CNBC less. Further, my post here saves everyone else from reading the article because its click-bait. Their bad faith headline is costing them clicks.
For now, sure. There as a time, now long ago, where I’d follow a Daily Mail link to read a story, until I noticed that the inflammatory headline used was never…ever substantiated. Now a refuse to even click on any Daily Mail links because I know they’re in bad faith. I don’t think I’m alone in this.
You clicked it and read the article, so it worked as intended. As long as this shit works, they will continue to do it.
True, and it makes me trust CNBC less. Further, my post here saves everyone else from reading the article because its click-bait. Their bad faith headline is costing them clicks.
Unfortunately it is still a clear net positive for them. Despite some of us actively pushing back against it, most people just click to read.
For now, sure. There as a time, now long ago, where I’d follow a Daily Mail link to read a story, until I noticed that the inflammatory headline used was never…ever substantiated. Now a refuse to even click on any Daily Mail links because I know they’re in bad faith. I don’t think I’m alone in this.
CNBC is voting itself onto that same block list.
okay dude