Many hold strong beliefs and opinions, however not many know the roots of their belief. If a person agrees to explore it, both of you will learn something new and fascinating. The problem is finding someone who wants to think and ask the questions. This goes for both. Many want to “convince” someone, but how much do you truly know about the thing you’re trying to prove?

This also comes back to the “why?” game so many kids play. Parents get annoyed by it, but are they really annoyed at the game or their lack of knowledge depth? Play the game, find out how deep you lake of knowledge goes

    • HeartyBeast
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Haven’t we all.

      More annoying though, is when you are really trying to understand the other person’s point of view and they shut down debate by the accusation of sealioning. There should be a word for that

      • Ragnell
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        The word is “tired”, I think. A lot of people just don’t have the energy to answer the whys and are used to bad actors using why to exhaust them. So when it comes to things like racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia…etc… it’s a) an exhausting subject to begin with when its aimed at you, and b) a magnet for disingenuous bigots and trolls, so people will just shut down the conversation rather than try and explain their whole existence.

        Honestly, I think isms are the only times when sealioning is sealioning, because that’s the only time you get people arguing in such bad faith.

        • HeartyBeast
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I think the only time I was accused of it was when trying to engage with a climate change denier. I wouldn’t be surprised if they were tired. I’m not particularly sympathetic.

          • Ragnell
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Oh, that’s a thing that status quo lovers do where they steal a useful term and turn it against us.