It’s one thing to have differing views, but I’ve seen enough attempted reddit migrations to be relieved that the popular communities in the fediverse so far haven’t been about crazy racist stuff or other extreme right bullshit.

I am also glad that I’m getting away from reddit’s general political shitposting, which was more left leaning. You couldn’t have any proper discourse on there, and even I with my generally more left leaning views recognized that.

  • siuvhne
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    it’s important to see that both sides have extremes and to assume that anyone who tips the scale “left” or “right” is somehow more right or more wrong is what keeps us from being able to find common ground. turning the words “conservative” and “liberal” into slurs is equally damaging. we both have ways of lashing out at each other when we are not the enemy. I bet we can agree that extremism is dangerous regardless of which side of the fence it resides on.

    • ErnestDoodler
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      Ha, you’re being downvoted for being reasonable and speaking basic truths. Has this place already become what made reddit such a shit show?

      • BraveSirZaphod
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        They’re probably being downvoted because presenting the political divide as an arbitrary choice between two equally valid options is a perspective that many would find naive at best and actively malicious at worst.

        Politics is mess, I don’t want to pretend that there’s no nuance (I certainly don’t agree with quite a lot of online leftist orthodoxy), and I won’t pretend to have an answer for our increasing polarization, but the simple fact of the matter is that we are not dealing with two equally valid sides. “Did Joe Biden win the 2020 election?”, “Are vaccines a conspiratorial attempt at government control?”, “Is climate change a severe and man-made phenomenon?”, and “Are LGBT people basically just evil perverted pedophiles?” are not subjective questions one can have a casual opinion on. They are objective questions with objective answers, and to pretend otherwise is simply wrong.

        Again, I’m very much not saying that the vague left is perfect by any means, but you only see one side start shooting at beer cans because a trans person had the audacity to exist.

        • siuvhne
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          let me start by acknowledging that I merely wanted to express that it’s not just “extreme right buffoonery” that’s a problem. to claim that there is no such thing as “extreme left
          buffoonery” is misleading.

          my comment clearly stated that the extremes on both ends are to be despised. politics is a game I don’t wish to be judged on because I’m seriously apolitical. we do need to meet in the middle. I’m not saying we need to forgive the “buffoonery” but cut out the rotten fruit and make a fucking jam. ideals are not arbitrary in any way. our ideals are built through life experience. I’m seeing a whole lot of each side trying to dehumanize the other for not agreeing with their politics. The “right” has rational, reasonable, kind humans who believe in human rights. but the fact that they may have a stance on the nanny state that the country is becoming somehow makes everyone who’s not a professed Democrat evil.

          regarding hate speech, frankly I’ve experienced more than my fair share. but that doesn’t count, right?

          • BraveSirZaphod
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            I get your point, really, and I don’t even strictly disagree. As I said, I disagree with a fair bit of your standard Online Left positions. I unironically like Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton and have the audacity to generally listen to economists; suffice it to say I’ve gotten more than fair share of online political hatred lol. Leftists will call me a shit liberal and conservatives will call me an evil gay communist.

            But what must be realized is that the Republican party as it exists today is simply not an equally viable and rational alternative group of people who simply have some different thoughts on tax policy and the scoped of government. I direly wish it was, but it simply is not that. Polarization sucks, and I don’t really have a clear answer for it, but the answer must not be taking the questions like “Are gay people secretly grooming your children?”, “Is climate change a hoax?”, “Was the 2020 election stolen from Trump?”, “Should we legally impose Christianity at every level of society?”, and “Is Hillary Clinton secretly a bloodthirsty cannibal that feeds off the youthful vitality of children?” and deciding that there are valid points on both sides.

            I get that politics is exhausting, but being “apolitical” is a political choice. It’s the decision that you’re okay with the status quo and that you don’t think it’s worth making a fuss about. I’m originally from deep rural Missouri, and while it has since been voided by the Courts, I have (adult) trans friends who began developing suicidal thoughts because the state was going to ban hormone therapy. This was a regime that ostensibly claims to be for limited government arbitrarily inserting itself in the private medical decisions of consenting adults for no reason other than to appeal to a base of bigots. Things like this matter, whether you choose to pay attention or not. Being able to ignore them is a luxury not everyone has.

          • siuvhne
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            I don’t tolerate hate speech, on either side of the fence.

            • MonsieurHedge
              link
              fedilink
              41 year ago

              God I am so curious as to what you consider hate speech “on the other side of the fence”.

              • VoxAdActa
                link
                fedilink
                61 year ago

                Yeah, me too.

                We won’t get any examples, though. At least not any examples of things real, relevant people actually said. The best they’ll do is drop a dumptruck’s worth of strawmen before flouncing off in a huff.

        • JasSmith
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Yeah it’s /r/Politics levels of “if you don’t agree with you YOU’RE HITLER!!!1!”

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Reddit is just an empty framework that got filled by communities of humans. The shape of the framework did have some impact, but ultimately human nature is the biggest influence on the form that those communities took.

        The Fediverse is a different framework, shaped a little bit differently but still basically the same. The same basic humans are building communities in it. I think all the smug “we’re better than Reddit” stuff is going to look rather silly once the Fediverse gets anywhere close to being as big as Reddit is.