Kunne være interessant at vide hvilke typer grammatiske “fejl” de opererer med; om det er stavefejl, lavstatus-formuleringer, eller decideret ugrammatiske sætninger som ‘Mand en hunden spiser’.
Participants were asked to listen to 40 short English speech samples, half of which contained grammatical errors against articles (e.g., a/an, the). To examine the sensitivity of physiological responses to grammatical errors in different contexts, the speech samples were presented in different accents (native vs. foreign) and by speakers of different gender (female vs. male), as these conditions have been found to affect listeners’ responses (Hanulíková, Van Alphen, Van Goch, & Weber, 2012; Linek, Gerjets, & Scheiter, 2010).
Edit 2: Det er en ret skør overskrift, der er basically bevist at man kan måle grammatikalitet indenfor et specifikt område via små hjerterytmeforskelle. Der er ingen der får stress af en forkert artikel.
Kunne være interessant at vide hvilke typer grammatiske “fejl” de opererer med; om det er stavefejl, lavstatus-formuleringer, eller decideret ugrammatiske sætninger som ‘Mand en hunden spiser’.
Man kan sf læse studiet hvis man vil :)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0911604423000544?via%3Dihub
Edit:
Participants were asked to listen to 40 short English speech samples, half of which contained grammatical errors against articles (e.g., a/an, the). To examine the sensitivity of physiological responses to grammatical errors in different contexts, the speech samples were presented in different accents (native vs. foreign) and by speakers of different gender (female vs. male), as these conditions have been found to affect listeners’ responses (Hanulíková, Van Alphen, Van Goch, & Weber, 2012; Linek, Gerjets, & Scheiter, 2010).
Edit 2: Det er en ret skør overskrift, der er basically bevist at man kan måle grammatikalitet indenfor et specifikt område via små hjerterytmeforskelle. Der er ingen der får stress af en forkert artikel.