• EvilCartyen
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Have you tried to use AI for documentation? It’s pretty shit.

    • Hupf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      Have you tried to use AI for <thing>? It’s pretty shit.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Translation, proofreading, summarizing, brainstorming, boilerplate code, protein folding…

        • stetech@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          protein folding

          We’re at the point where, due to how b2c tech services work, I think a lot of people think AI === LLM

    • owl@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I did not mean writing documentation with AI. I mean I hand the bad documentation to the AI, ask a question and get a response.

    • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’ve used AI to give me a good enough guess that I know the right keywords to search for too find the real documentation.

    • thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve had pretty good experience with using AI to find what I’m looking for in documentation, especially if the docs are in context

      • SatyrSack@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think they mean having an AI read code and then write documentation for it. Not having an AI read documentation.