

He’s been chair for the ouster of David Hogg and the shameful behavior of the party he chairs toward Mamdani.
He’s not the savior you’re touting him as.
He’s been chair for the ouster of David Hogg and the shameful behavior of the party he chairs toward Mamdani.
He’s not the savior you’re touting him as.
Single best decision she’s ever made.
Dude’s gonna start world war III to distract from how he rapes children.
BREAKING: epstein files still not released.
They could remove the need for filibuster but that ALSO REQUIRES 60 VOTES.
Ending the filibuster forever requires only 51. Don’t lie on behalf of the people who won’t do it just because you like the results.
The general election is over, and it is no longer necessary to defend the contents of that list, to include Kamala Harris.
They don’t want the needle moving to the left. So she was just shy of absolute perfection and was failed by the villainous electorate.
Poaching at least implies a living creature.
pushing Clinton under the bus for the better good, as they should
They can throw people who aren’t vulnerable minorities under there?
From the people who brought you “biden is the most progressive president since FDR.”
liberals to fight with each other.
Liberals don’t fight each other. They fight the left. Liberals are in perfect lockstep: they want republican votes so badly that they will throw any minority under the bus and back up over them as many times as they think it will take.
Another standard issue centrist caring more about games than human rights.
Came here for this cover of this song.
What do you get when you cross a horse with a borzoi?
See, I didn’t see “slappers only” as a requirement, considering that the dudes in the cave painting were usin’ spears.
I mean, is this just an impromptu gorilla fight, or do we get to plan?
He’s fundamentally right, if your goal is to try to win elections.
That works until you need to win re-election and everyone saw what you became when you took office.
Yeah, it’s not like democrats have a credibility problem.
Through what means and with what downside?
He could have simply said that he wouldn’t be selling them weapons in accordance with the Leahy Law.
Whose votes do you think he would lose? Centrists? I thought they were all about “no matter who.”
Oh, there was plenty she could have done about it. She chose to keep supporting the bidenyahu genocide.