• ampersandrew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Anyone promising to return people to previously prosperous economic conditions will be popular, even if people don’t know that the promise can’t possibly be delivered. Coal isn’t coming back either, and there’s no “clean” version of it, but if all you’ve done in your life is coal, you’ll vote for the guy who says he’s bringing coal back.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Trump was basically the equivalent of the guy in your street that says when he’s president, everyone gets a million dollars and a pony.

    • misk@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m not here to convince liberals that they should try to care for the poor. I’m here to argue that the jig is up - people are voting for literally anyone, including fascists, that promises to change the course.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        That second part is exactly what I just said. Is it caring for the poor to lie to them about economic realities, or to raise the cost on everyday items via tariffs when money is already tight? Again, I’m no expert, but I’d rather vote for promised solutions that I understand to actually work rather than the ones that sound good and don’t work.