• Ethalis@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    312
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sure, that’s great but it’s not even the point. Fundamental research and other type of “useless” scientific endeavors help humanity as a whole to better understand our universe but would never be privately funded because they don’t have any concrete and immediate financial benefits. This is precisely what a government should finance, because no one else would do it and yet it’s small stuff like that that make us collectively move forward as a species

        • moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          46
          ·
          1 month ago

          The Department of goverment efficiency was Musk’s meme idea and Trump is apparently just rolling with it.

          • algorithmae@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 month ago

            Thanks for actually explaining it instead of downvoting me. Heaven forbid I’m not aware of every micro-connotation caused by the current depressing news cycle

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Maybe. Apparently trump is already bored with him, and mocked him on-stage in front of an entire room full of people, just a couple days ago. I guess trump already got his money, so now it’s time to back-out of any agreements he made to get the money.

            • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 month ago

              I think that’s just Trump’s insecurity acting up because Musk gets nearly as much worship from his fans as he does. Hence him trying to mar Musk’s reputation and knock him down a few pegs.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      help humanity as a whole

      And here you’ve identified why they hate it. They cannot stand the idea that resources might benefit other people, resources that they could hoard instead.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    1 month ago

    The world just keeps getting more and more efficient at being dumb. Let’s just count all the appallingly stupid things crammed into this small meme with 2 million views:

    1. “Insurrection Barbie”
    2. Celebrating the defunding of useful scientific research by a new government efficiency agency
    3. This new agency is named after a cryptocurrency
    4. The cryptocurrency in question was created as a joke to satirize cryptocurrencies, but became a top prominent cryptocurrency itself.
    5. The “Department of Government Efficiency Agency” has 2 heads, both of whom have other primary jobs and were chosen in return for political support.
    6. There is also already an existing government agency that does the exact same thing, called the “Government Accountability Office”. But most people seem to be unaware of it, likely because it’s not named after a cryptocurrency/dog meme.
    7. This whole scheme was the idea of the richest person in the world.

    Idiocracy didn’t happen because of unnatural selection, it happened because social media unlocked a runaway chain reaction of stupidity.

    • RandomVideos@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Why are people saying that it was named after a cryptocurrency?

      Isnt the dog the first thing people think of when seeing “doge”?

      • zeca@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Its reasonable to make the connection to the coin, as this particular cryptocurrency was propagandized and manipulated by musk, who will be running the agency.

        • RandomVideos@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 month ago

          Wouldnt it be possible that he just likes the doge meme, promoting a cryptocurrency that is named after it?

          • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            No, he likes money. Remember a few years ago when he tweeted about how great dogecoin was? Then a week later he tweeted about how stupid is was and that he was done with? He probably made millions buying and selling dogecoin as he made those tweets. There ia a huge conflict of interest when it comes to celebrities endorsing crypto coins. If you have the pull, you can just buy a bunch of some shit coin, talk it up and then all the people who look up to you to will go buy it, pumping up the price while you sell and make a huge profit. Then the value crashes back down and everyone who bought is left holding the bag. Whenever some famous person talks about a crypto, 100% of the time it is a grift to skim money from their follower’s pockets.

            • nomous@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              1 month ago

              100% spot on, pump and dumps are especially rampant in crypto because a couple of people can generate a ton of coins and own the entire market for that coin. If they can get that price to rise even just a fractional amount through whatever completely unregulated means they can dump it to the suckers buying and cash out. It’s like printing money but the printing presses are stupid people.

              • Mike D.@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 month ago

                This has been going on for years.

                People used to find an almost dead crypto-coin, buy up as many coins as possible, and then pretend they were developing back from the dead. Then they would cash out.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 month ago

        True! It was then technically named after a meme…which the coin named itself after, as it was supposed to be a “meme coin”.

        Still stands though.

        “Government agency named after meme. Such dumb. So chaos. Woooooow.” Lol

      • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        Isnt the dog the first thing people think of when seeing “doge”?

        It used to be so, but in recent several years Doge has lived and pretty much been defined in public consciousness by the cryptocurrency, which Musk has openly endorsed/memed.

      • sleeperdouge@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        It was for me until a few years ago. I used doge as a base for most of my internet alias since I like the meme (as you can see from my username). One time inside a game, I was asked if I was a crypto bro because of my ign. At the time, i don’t like crypto but have no hard feelings against it. Ever since then I loath those crypto bros and their worship of crypto currencies for destroying the image of doge and with their stupid crypto currency nonsense.

  • GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    1 month ago

    In addition, government research in the sciences is miniscule. You could cut ALL of science funding and be no where close to the 1 trillion that Musk claims he’ll be able to reduce the budget by

    • BossDj@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 month ago

      Regardless, he’ll claim he cut 500 bajillion dollars no matter what he ends up doing

        • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          No no, you don’t understand. This is what people have actually been asking for this whole time. Nobody wanted the budget randomly cut, they wanted it distributed

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          He’ll cut 2 trillion out of the general budget, redirect it into his own holdings, and demand praise for his genius leadership. Oh, and he may or may not actually eliminate some programs along the way.

        • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 month ago

          I don’t think he even attempted to do math. Someone asked him about it and said what the current budget was, and he just rectally sourced 2 trillion. I assume he said that because it’s big enough to sound huge, but less than half of spending so people don’t panic that everything will be cut.

          It’s meaningless bullshit until he actually says specifically what will be cut. Republicans have been claiming they can cut huge chunks of spending for years, but it never materializes. They only know how cut government income without paying for it.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 month ago

            Still waiting for that ACA replacement promised on week 1 of trump’s presidency. It was supposed to be so easy. Now we’re 8 years out and they have “concepts of a plan”.

            • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’m sure with control over all government branches again they’ll have the ACA completely replaced in no time. For real this time.

              • chaogomu@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                The plan is to repeal it first, and then figure out what to do from there.

                Probably whatever makes the most money for insurance companies.

    • 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      The goal’s more about cutting all the science funding than reducing spending. These are people who bitch about Ukraine when they don’t even plan on spending that money on something else they’re just guzzling Russian propaganda.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    And so the US lost decade becomes the medieval dark ages

    It’d be fascinating as an outsider if the choices made by the US didn’t basically impact everything, everywhere.

  • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    1 month ago

    Say it with me:

    No. Research. Is. Useless.

    If we say that research is useless because it doesn’t bring you mo ey we could stop teaching children math beyond the absolute basics because “it doesn’t brinf them anything”. This is stupid, because those are the fundamentals that tech children to thing logically and become useful member of society. Same with research. It teaches us the things necessary to maybe invent some of the most useful stuff ever seen

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      You say that but I’ve heard concerningly many people say that there is no point in teaching everyone stuff like basic math because chances are they won’t use it

      • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        I also hear that argument often and I absolutely hate it. They always say “tech them things like insert manual labor work. Nobody needs Math.”

        It always depends. A lot of people will likely never use a saw outside of school. Especially in a time where a lot of people go to university the skills that complex math teaches you are basically the bare necessitys. Also school usually is teaches you the basic broad knowledge and skills required to get more specific education on a specific topic. This includes studying all different subjects and also getting training as a woodworker. It is literally impossible to focus on everything and that also isn’t really the use of school. Its just the first and universal form of education.

        • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          Besides all that manual labor requires math. A ton requires geometry.

          You think plumbing, framing, electrical or any trade is done without measuring and quite complicated math?

          • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Especially in America. Sure just cut that board down to 29-13/64 inches…and remember the blade is 1/8" thick.

        • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’ve already seen this exact same claim these days, so now I decided to try and find out what’s happening exactly.

          https://www.dw.com/en/indiadropsevolution/a-65804720

          Apparently, it happened last year, not just now, as you said, and I’m sure I’ve already seem someone else (maybe on Lemmy, maybe on reddit) also describe it as a very recent event.

          However I can’t find absolutely anything else regarding the topic. So I tried googling in Hindi instead, with the help of some machine translation.

          https://www.aajtak.in/education/news/story/pythagoras-theorem-has-vedic-has-roots-karnataka-panel-proposes-to-sanskrit-as-a-third-language-1496805-2022-07-10

          This is the only piece of news I’ve managed to find, again not very recent, and not nearly as dramatic as the DW article makes it out to be. Some official has described the Pythagorean theorem as ‘fake news’ because that same theorem had already been developed in India before Pythagoras, i.e. the point is that the name is a misnomer. They say nothing about removing the theorem.

          The reduction of teaching of the periodic table and evolution that DW mentions is also explained in the PDF that the article links as mere reorganisation of the topics due to the circumstances (difficulties in teaching during corona). They don’t suggest actual removal of the topics. (The PDF is an official explanation from the Indian “National Council of Educational Research and Training”.)

          I’m getting the impression DW is just fearmongering. Ideally there should be some article with exact and complete quotes in Hindi. I know that media freedom in India is not great (esp. considering the situation with Wikipedia), and it’s probably not easy to get to the bottom of it, but this story looks very suspicious.

              • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                Probably! I knew there was another subject mentioned, but couldn’t remember what it was, so I didn’t mention it. Now that you said the periodic table, I’m certain that was the second subject mentioned.

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I agree no research is useless but some just goes straight into the bonkers folder.

      • cows_are_underrated@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, but just because a scientist calculated what would happen if we replaced the earth with blueberrys doesn’t mean we should defund him.

        • qyron@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          If a scientist came to me asking for funding to research on bodily odor (which has happened, if memory serves me well) I would be baffled by the request but I wouldn’t outright deny it.

          Sweaty arm pits. Stinky feet. Bad breath. Farts.

          The lab would have to be declared a bio hazard area by itself. Too good to miss out. Just the chance to see someone trying to keep a straight face while taking in some of these fine bouquet of rancid would be too good to miss.

          Imagine watching the footage of a day of work.

  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    ·
    1 month ago

    “preventing next corn plague” with resources used being a box of soil and bunch of underpaid grads seems pretty efficient to me, but i guess that since the common clay of the new west already voted they can be safely disposed of

    at USDA, they’re turning beetles kinky! 😡

    • alex jones fuming aimlessly while being stored in some container
  • Randelung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 month ago

    Like the dead don’t realize they’re dead, they don’t realize they’re stupid. They’re just everyone else’s problem.

  • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    China is going to devour the scientific world if we keep it like this

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Won’t happen, or at least won’t be useful if it does. Lotta Chinese authors are faking data for the sake of the CCP and their studies don’t replicate. If that takes over, it’ll be like a global Dark Age.

    • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Going to continue devouring the scientific world with lots of smart Westerners leaving the new SlaveTastictm USA

      • Zement@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Republicans deserve no progress. Let them fall back into the ages they desire. No Smartphones. That’s which science.

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      China has a problem. It isn’t good at finding the best people and putting them into science (or whatever else). Instead it gets the loyal people and gives them the best jobs, they then select people below them however they will

      People then strive for recognition and advancement so scientific fraud is rife

  • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Neolib idiots don’t see the (immense) value of fundamental research because it doesn’t directly generate profits, more at 11

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        True, but I don’t think many of them would say that to your face (including musk who I assume would pretend to be neolib, who do kind of have a hate boner for basic research, at least in my country)

        • ReCursing@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Fascists lie, including about being fascists. Trump is a fascist, his party are fascists, those who work for him, even if they don’t go all in on fascists values, are absolutely tarrable with the same brush. The biggest difference between them and the Nazis is that the Nazis had better dress sense

    • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Which is stupid, because even video games make you research sticks before you can make nuclear reactors. Guess even entertainment can’t teach dumb shits anything. Just retaining nothing.

    • pufferfisherpowder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Elon isn’t even religious. Like always religion is just a fucking disguise for enriching themselves, both with money and power.

    • django@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Stupidly funny, right? Like watching a movie, where something dumb is about to happen. You are watching and screaming in agony, pleading for the characters on the screen not to do the dumb thing. But you watch in horror, as all your words are without any effect, you can’t reach anyone.

      But now with the added bonus, that the dumb thing might affect your life. Or that of your loved ones, neighbours, friends.

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Living in Australia, with China just to the north as our largest trade partner, I’m not looking forward to what is going to happen with America’s allies in relation to China

    • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m thinking this too… let’s hope Renaissance mk2 only takes a few years to blossom - but my confidence is not high.

  • 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hell can we mention that the cold war era these fucks idolize was also the golden age of the government throwing money at side projects?

  • mac@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 month ago

    The appointment of Elon Musk to lead the proposed department of government efficiency raises concerns, given his track record of business management.

    His handling of Twitter/X after its $44 billion acquisition has resulted in a significant decline in its value, with some sources putting the valuation around $9bn.

    Doesn’t seem very efficient to me.

    • Dasus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not just significant, I’m pretty sure the loss in value is some sort of a record, for real.

    • psud@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      This idea has been around for a while. Make government more efficient by putting a private enterprise person in charge

      It never worked because the private enterprise person got efficiency by having a cool project or forceful personality in the private enterprise which let them pay their employees poorly. Or maybe they paid their employees well and had excellent success. But then they have government employees who are hard to fire, have highly specialist knowledge, aren’t in it for profit and so the private enterprise maverick is usually [worse than] useless

      I don’t expect it to work this time either, especially as Musk is more interested in Tesla, SpaceX, and his other companies

  • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    It’s also helped develop advances in flight, metamaterials, physics.

    But Barbie makes a good point with a meme about how she treats her cuck husband.

  • mayhair@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah, we’ve been studying the sex lives of various different animals (including ourselves!) for centuries now, yet nobody bat an eye until now. 🙄