so a common claim I see made is that arch is up to date than Debian but harder to maintain and easier to break. Is there a good sort of middle ground distro between the reliability of Debian and the up-to-date packages of arch?

  • nickiam2@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That’s true. i do sometimes have issues with the ZFS package not compiling because of a too new kernel not being supported yet.