A British nurse refused to appear in court on Monday to be sentenced for the murders of seven babies and attempted murders of six others at the UK hospital where she worked.

Lucy Letby, 33, could face a whole life order, meaning she spends the rest of her life behind bars, when she is sentenced later at Manchester Crown Court in northern England. She was found guilty on Friday by a jury, in a case that horrified the country and made her the most prolific child serial killer of recent times.

  • Fisk400@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you are ever sentenced to something simply refuse. They can’t sentence you without your consent.

    • li10@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Apparently you can be found innocent by coughing before they read the verdict and saying “dipshit says guilty”

  • clothes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    This nurse: horrible

    Commenters proposing various forms of vigilante justice and torture: horrible

    This isn’t Reddit! We don’t have to be assholes here!

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right.

      I know that in cases like these, our emotions get riled and the lines between justice and revenge become blurred.

      Trust me, you want to live in a just society, not a vengeful one. Don’t let your heart rule your head!

    • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right?

      This is Lemmy: much worse in very specific ways, with little to none of the self awareness of Reddit.

    • aeternum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, honestly, are we any better than the murderer if we propose they be raped in prison or whatever?

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 year ago

    She’s going to get life in prison either way, so what’s the point of her going to any more hearings?

    • SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe it’s at the sentencing that victim impact statements are read. It’s the only time victims can speak directly to the perpetrator. Some victims might get a sense of closure from that.

        • SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not about her, it’s about the victims. They want the opportunity to speak in open court and to witness her sentencing. Currently she can just opt not to go but I think they’re looking into changing the law so that the victims can have at least that.

      • draughtcyclist@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I can’t believe you can just opt out of that after murdering someone’s children. Incarceration would be mandatory. Why is this not?

          • Tatters@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I still don’t think they will be able to physically force the perpetrator to be present for the sentencing and victim impact statements, as this could result in very upsetting and unpredictable scenes in the courtroom for the victim’s families, if the prisoner chooses to freak out. Instead, I think there will be additional punishments for non-attendance. But if you are likely to be given a whole life sentence, what additional punishment could be effective compared to that?

        • Fisk400@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s because you can’t really force a person to behave properly if they don’t want to. They could force her to be there but they would have to restrain her and gag her because she could just scream and kick the entire time. It’s so easy for her to spoil the moment that they only do it if she is on board with it.

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Murderous cluster b personality disorder woman throws tantrum when faced with consequences. Who could’ve seen that coming.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really wish I’d stop hearing this woman’s name everywhere. Don’t want this kind of fucking crime to be celebratized.

    • vlad@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly what happens with school shootings as well. People wonder “Why did kids go shoot up schools? They must have been influenced by the [group name]!” And then they do a 24 hour news cycle where they dig up every single thing about the shooter and try to find a deeper meaning in their actions. If you were a kid being bullied all the time and you saw that on the news, of course you’d think “Wait a minute. I can make them all pay??”. Kids are crazy impressionable. Adults aren’t much better, though.

  • DannyMac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hope she lives a long life full of mystery and pain, but she’ll probably be isolated from general population. I’m not sure how the British penal system compares to the US.

  • mihor@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    They should just have her hanged, drawn, and quartered.