Both President Biden and the White House have enabled the Fediverse integration on Threads.

  • leadore@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I don’t consider being on Threads as being “on the fediverse”. My definition of the fediverse is servers that follow the Activity Pub protocol to interact with each other. You might disagree with that definition, but Threads only lets us “follow” (view-only) certain of their accounts (only about 2000 out of millions) from Mastodon. Those accounts do not see any replies to their post from the fediverse, or any fediverse posts at all for that matter–we are invisible to them. So no, he’s not “on the fediverse”, he’s on Threads. I doubt he knows the fediverse even exists.

    • Sean Tilley@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Thing is, for federation to work, his team had to opt into it. The fact that his statuses and profile render natively in Mastodon and Akkoma are a pretty strong start.

      I’d like to see Meta put their money where their mouths are, and finish the integration. I think we’ll probably see that happen sooner rather than later.

      • leadore@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Personally I hope they never do, though it does look likely. Like many pre-November '22 old-time Mastodon et.al. fedizens, I came to the fediverse specifically because I didn’t want to have anything with FB/Meta/Twitter or the other commercial, “engagement”-based, enshittified social media.

        It feels like the fediverse is being gentrified, with half of it eagerly welcoming their new overlords (why don’t they just join Threads?) and the other half resisting. The half that doesn’t federate with Meta will move on, like people priced out of their own neighborhoods by gentrification, and become the new “real fediverse” where people can go to live free from corporate interference.

        • Sean Tilley@lemmy.mlOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          It feels like the fediverse is being gentrified

          As someone who has repeatedly seen cities become gentrified (first Peoria, Illinois, then San Francisco, then Phoenix), I get what you’re trying to say, but also don’t think it’s an appropriate metaphor.

          The half that doesn’t federate with Meta will move on, like people priced out of their own neighborhoods by gentrification, and become the new “real fediverse” where people can go to live free from corporate interference.

          Frankly, I think this is a bit melodramatic. The Anti-Threads part of the Fediverse will stay in their isolated bubble with little to no change, while the rest of the network continues to grow or change. It’s not like operational costs are skyrocketing, or that hosting will become any more scarce or more difficult. It’s not like the servers have to move to a different neighborhood. Gentrification is predicated on the finiteness of physical space and affordable places to live.

          and become the new “real fediverse” where people can go to live free from corporate interference.

          This is probably news to you, but there’s not even a coherent, all-encompassing definition for what the Fediverse even is. The idea that there’s a “real Fediverse” vs “Fake Fediverse” glosses over all kinds of history and nuance. The best anyone’s gotten to defining it is by specifying protocols and interoperability, but even that doesn’t quite cover it.

          The Fediverse isn’t just the parts you like, minus the parts you don’t like.

          • poVoq@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 months ago

            It’s not like operational costs are skyrocketing, or that hosting will become any more scarce or more difficult.

            That remains to be seen. There are multiple ways a single huge instance could drive up costs for everyone else, especially when there isn’t organic growth that allows developers to find creative workarounds to firehose problems.

            Lemmy has been seeing federation-desync issues over the last couple of weeks due to a bug in kbin being amplified by Lemmy.world. I imaging a similar issue but with a fully federated Threads would simply ddos most fediverse instances out of existence.

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        If Google killed XMPP, how come some enterprise communication products (off the top of my head I can name two that are successful at least in Europe) use it?

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          There is XMPP the protocol which is indeed still widely used by commercial entities, and there is XMPP the open federated network, also called Jabber, which is still alive but Google did kneecap it pretty hard back then.

          • woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            XMPP as used in the enterprise communication product my employer uses (AFAIK based on the common open source implementation) sucks as much on mobile as Xabber which I used back in the day. I get notifications 30 minutes late if at all. That thing killed itself by not adapting to smartphones.

            • poVoq@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              That’s a bad implementation then. Modern open-source XMPP works great on mobile, no problems with notifications at all on Android. iOS is more of a mixed bag, but that is solely Apple’s fault and applies to all messengers other than iMessage.

              • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                That’s a bad implementation then. Modern open-source XMPP works great on mobile

                The issue was the state of mobile clients when XMPP died in the mainstream and state of the art was crap like Xabber. Conversations was better but too little, too late.

                iOS is more of a mixed bag, but that is solely Apple’s fault and applies to all messengers other than iMessage.

                Telegram works flawlessly pretty much everywhere, including iOS which my mom uses.

                • poVoq@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Well, Monal on iOS doesn’t work worse than Telegram on iOS, so then apparently it’s flawless as well. I am not an iOS user, but I heard complaints about Telegram on iOS as well regarding notifications.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      If I can follow some mainstream entertainment accounts from Mastodon, I’m fine with that. I dislike having to log onto Twitter or Threads just to find out what some motorsports teams are up to.

    • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      You could create another account on someone else’s instance to do it you really wanted to

        • Mongostein@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          To… umm… read Biden’s posts?

          I don’t want to either, I’m just saying you could.

          lol at the downvotes. I guess suggesting two accounts to access different Lemmy instances - something many people already do - is offensive to some. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • roguetrick@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m surprised the white house doesn’t just host a mastodon server. I’m sure they consider using unvetted software to communicate to be a security risk, but it’s no less a risk to put your communication channels in the hands of a third party.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      7 months ago

      Biden: Tell me again what a femcel is

      Staff: Please just let’s go back to Tiktok

      Biden: What’s a fursona

    • Sean Tilley@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’d actually love to see something like this happen, as it seems to be something European governments and officials are embracing. To have something similar for the United States would be incredible.

      I think at the moment, there’s a real need for advocates, consultants, and vendors that can actually cater to government entities here. I would imagine there’s probably some crazy data requirements needed for US Government Officials.

      • poVoq@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’d actually love to see something like this happen, as it seems to be something European governments and officials are embracing.

        I had the chance to ask the responsible person of the EU commission about this at the last CCC congress and sadly he was much less optimistic. The answer basically boilded down to: as long as someone else funds and maintains it they are willing to put an intern or similar at work to post updates, but currently all these efforts are time limited and when funding for the 3rd party to operate them runs out, these efforts are likely to die off quickly. The actual buy in and willingness to operate their own social media infrastructure seems to be very low.

    • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Even better, that should be their primary social network site. It’s inherently restricted to valid government accounts and under their control so all the right data protection and preservation procedures can be followed. Then Threads users can follow potus@socia.whitehouse.gov or whatever.

  • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    On one hand I hate all the threads hype that is happening (and am for threads blocking).

    On the other hand I don’t think I’ve seen a bigger example of why threads federating is maybe a big deal. POTUS posts on one’s mastodon server, with two-way reply federation coming (?), which can be on a small or individual server, does not ever happen without Threads doing this.

    Like, if you’re an author of the protocol like Evan, hoping for your system to make it, POTUS posting over it is certainly a milestone and I’d imagine it’s not at all negligible for the likes of Evan.

    Thing is, it was just a button click on Threads because Zuck decided to provide it, which is still shit.

    • fediverse_report@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      yeah its a big deal because of the spillover effort on how much easier this makes conversations with other gov officials about setting up a fedi server. I’m somewhat involved in this process at this point, and now being able to say that ‘biden is on the fediverse’ really impacts lobbying for the fediverse more broadly

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      When you visit a Lemmy community, only its home server displays the actual subscriber number. If you visit the community from a different server, it shows only the number of subscribers from your server. That’s the reason I put one of those subscriber count badges in the side bar, so everyone can see the correct number.

      • pedroapero@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        I highly doubt that there are 2.8M members on my instance (not to mention potus subscribers)

  • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Uhh… have they not been paying attention to the bans against Threads? Somebody over there isn’t doing their job.

  • Melkath@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Rams through major bribery to kill TikTok and try to force a sell to Facebook.

    Immediately sets up a Threads account.

    Tik Tak Toe.

      • Melkath@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        With what?

        Facebook has been death rattling for the better part of a decade.

        The metaverse failed.

        Oh shit… the Oculus.

        Cheaper means higher volume means spy-ie-er.

        So that’s how they could afford that NEARLY UNANIMOUS bill.

        To be fair, I have a vive and it is just as much of a data breach.

        • LanternEverywhere@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Facebook is the 3rd most visited website. Instagram (which is also owned by them) is the 4th most visited site. Oculus is and has been the best selling vr system by a lot. As much as we would like it not to be true, the reality is that facebook is extremely far from death rattling

          https://www.similarweb.com/top-websites/

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          WhatsApp is the world’s most widely used messenger. FB Messenger (which is now its own product for whatever reason) is also extremely successful.