A federal judge in West Virginia has ruled that the state corrections agency can’t force an incarcerated atheist and secular humanist to participate in religiously-affiliated programming to be eligible for parole.

    • b3nsn0w@pricefield.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      yeah, it seems what they meant is freedom to be a christian without the pope and absolutely nothing else. no nonbelievers, no non-abrahamics, hell, not even any abrahamic believers who believe in other religions. protestant, mormon, or cringe catholic, take your pick or go to literal hell.

      and the best part is when they use the excuse of religious freedom as a shield for their bigotry. like i’m sorry, if your holy book literally calls for gays to be stoned to death that’s a call to violence, it doesn’t deserve to be protected or tolerated.

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel like this is inaccurate. What other religions were on hand in the late 1700s? The native religions, of course, but the white guys did not care about that.

          Of course there was an emphasis on avoiding dependence on any one organized religion. That was one way of keeping power in the right hands.

          And in the 1970s and 1980s, it depends where in the US, but in many places or was and is very common to be Christian. If there is an strong majority, there’s no need to explicitly weaponize because society itself is already pushing your agenda. But that doesn’t mean harm wasn’t caused.

      • palindrome@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly can someone even provide me with an excerpt from the bible that actively cites the hatred of homosexuals

    • Hazzard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even as a Christian myself, I agree with you. Separation of Church and State. Politics mixing with religion has been terrible for both.

      • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Politics mixing with religion has been terrible for both.

        No it hasn’t. Religions benefit almost immeasurably from infiltrating politics in so many ways, ranging from expemption from all discrimination laws, to having their private schools funded by tax money, to controlling the majority of hospitals in the country, to being allowed to rape and marry children consequence free.

      • ChrisLicht@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let me try a different argument:

        The separation of church and state has forced American denominations to compete in a marketplace for souls/money, and they have become ruthlessly efficient corporatized entities, using marketing and business-process management, and exploiting tax advantages and high switching costs.

        Meanwhile, in Europe, you have official state Catholicism or Protestantism-flavors, which are moribund, inspire little passion, and most everyone is either atheist, agnostic, or un-passioned.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Absolutely. It’s hard to conceive of something that has been more damaging to society than Abrahamic religion.

    • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The country was founded of freedom of religion by the fanatics who were too fanatical for England.

      • cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        No certain colonies were founded by zealots too fanatical for England and the Netherlands, the country was founded by slave owning wealthy people

        • steltek@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Founders were steeped in the Age of Enlightenment. Modern Americans wouldn’t even recognize it as Christianity. Like The Jefferson Bible

          … completed in 1820 by cutting and pasting with a razor and glue numerous sections from the New Testament as extractions of the doctrine of Jesus. Jefferson’s condensed composition excludes all miracles by Jesus and most mentions of the supernatural, including sections of the four gospels that contain the Resurrection and most other miracles, and passages that portray Jesus as divine.

          You could label their morality puritanical but I think cynicism would also equally apply. If you view humans as naturally greedy and selfish, society needs to codify expected behavior to keep it in check.

      • MostlyBirds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope. This country was founded on the idea that weathly people shouldn’t have to pay their fair share of taxes.

    • TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The fact it’s had to go that far is psychotic.

      This reminds me of one of my favorites quotes, which is about the 2020 US presidential election, and I’m not even from the USA, but it’s suitable in so much scenarios in life: “It shouldn’t be this close.”

  • BenVimes@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the “Big Book,” the foundational document of these programs, “Chapter 4: We Agnostics” tells atheists and agnostics that they are “doomed to alcoholic death” unless they “seek Him.” The chapter characterizes non-believers as “handicapped by obstinacy, sensitiveness, and unreasoning prejudice.”

    This really jumped out at me. What a horrible thing to say about someone, especially someone looking for help.

    • AlGoreRhythm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Unreasoning prejudice” ain’t that just the richest projection you’ve ever seen🤣🤣🤣

    • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Alcoholic death? That’s weirdly specific. I barely even drink. If I do, then I do it to get drunk, but not to comatose type of levels.

      • Kandorr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Big Book being discussed in this comment is one of the foundations of the Alcoholics Anonymous program. Hence this warning about alcoholism. AA features a higher power as part of recovery.

      • damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Am I allowed to drink alcohol as long as I believe in God, I’m not quite I understand their random system of belief.

        Also, I guess that drugs are okay?

  • Pabs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a Latin American, it seems to me that Christian fanaticism is so wide spread in the US it almost feels cartoonish, like the sort of general impression one gets from any cult or fundamentalist religious group. And I’m from Latin America!

    • damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It always reminds me of North Korea, or China. No matter what else you do, you must be seen to believe in the right thing or else you are some kind of evil deviant.

      What the religion or belief system is actually is is about is almost irrelevant. The important thing is to believe, understanding it is entirely not required and almost frowned upon.

  • exohuman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good. I have grown tired of the brainwashed reformed criminal that spends all his time being overly aggressive about religion and downright hateful with it.

  • negativeyoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So while I’m all for this, think about the person trying to get a parole board to write off on their parole. Even if the person is in the right I can only imagine that it’s still in that person’s best interests to at least act the good christian because the parole board can deny them for any reason with no need to explain.

    American society is so fucked.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You also get special privileges if you’re religious in prison, like better food if you’re keeping Kosher or Halal and being let out of your cell to go to religious services. Even if you’re an atheist, I could see why you would pretend.