Does the option to add an image via URL not work? I have tried in both Brave and Firefox desktop browsers and the Brave mobile app - clicking the “From URL” or “Upload File” doesn’t appear to do anything.

The only thing that does anything from this menu is clicking the filepath to upload a file from local.

Am I missing something?

  • Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You might want to do some cleanup; this got reposted a bunch.

    But to answer the question, I don’t believe that works yet.

    • McBinary@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yep. Got a ton of errors… It happens a lot here. I deleted all but 1.

      “We are working on resolving the issues
      Over the next few days, there will be a change in server infrastructure. Temporary problems with the website’s functionality may occur during this time.”

    • McBinary@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I dunno, but it seems like this ought to be a pretty high priority, as hosting all the images locally is going to get exponentially more expensive as more people come to kbin… Being able to use a web image host is a much easier option.

      • tal@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Another possibility I was thinking about last night is when federated servers obtain local copies of comments that reference images, if the server enables the option to do so, also replicating the image and causing users viewing the comment via that server to use that instance’s copy of the image.

        That does mean that keeping the original comment text and maybe signature on the image around might be necessary if pubkey signing of comments or something comes into play later – so it’s a design decision that might have some long-running effects.

        Given that serving images might be a significant chunk of the bandwidth that kbin instances use, it has implications for where costs lie – on the instance where the community lives, or on the instance that has the users – so it might be worth careful consideration.