tl;dr- s23 ultra with snapdragon 8 gen 2 performed much better under heavy load than the 3nm a17 pro on iphone 15 pm
which shows -
- node size is useless as a17 pro was more inefficient
- android apps are also optimised, sometimes better than iOS
- bechmark scores are useless
On the benchmark note, keep in mind that this test depends greatly on GPU performance also whereas geekbench is testing the CPU. Snapdragon has been doing a fantastic job on the GPU front.
oh yeah!
I forgor💀
Interesting results. Wonder how much would change after further software updates on the iphone. 15 pro seems to have had a poor optimization. If they had taken this video a week or so ago, it would have been considerably worse.
This might be a limitation of their overall chip design. It’s meant to have a lot more power, but also to throttle more quickly. The A17 does this to a greater extent than the A16 (see RE: Village performance).
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/watch?v=dGfMmbW1j34
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.
The higher brightness is a big plus on the Samsung… no point in having processing power if the display is too dim to see.
What a weird take. You’re acting like everyone is power using their phone on the surface of the sun only.
It’s just fundamentally better to see more information than less.
Bring back the Note, you cowards…
What does the note do that the ultra doesn’t?
Absolutely nothing.
Reminds you that you have an S Pen :).
How?
Seeing its name!
I have an S23 Ultra and my wife has a Note 20 Ultra. Both have S-Pens and look nearly identical and had nearly identical MSRPs. The S23 Ultra is effectively an up-to-date Note.
