• mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    247
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I already hate people who send voice messages in a world where dictation software exists. I hate whoever even thought of joking about this even more.

  • Malix@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    but what about programmers with problems hearing? An alternative of webcam video with sign language, pantomime and subtitles is needed!

    edit: OOH! Use AI to generate the sign language videos. Could be wild, considering how good AI is at drawing hands.

      • trailing9@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You joke but with chatGPT it’s inevitable. Old school programmers will stick to source code but tools for non-programmers will collect plain text descriptions to create functionality.

        Inevitably, images and all other media will become part of it.

        Future developers will have to navigate those collections and wonder why a functionality doesn’t work when they remove some side-tracking Instagram stories. They will shrug, leave them in place and heap on further memes and comments until they complete their jira ticket.

        • IonAddis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          So what I’m hearing is that computer code will eventually drift closer to DNA where “noncoding” sequences actually perform regulatory functions but in a way that’s super-arcane, and all you know is if you get rid of the noncoding bits the proteins change expression for some bizarre reason…

    • aaron@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      This guy embeds TicTok URLs in source comments followed by long strings of emoji

  • Luftruessel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 year ago

    Looking at how good textual documentation works, it would probably be a 3s long note reading out the method name

    • UpperBroccoli@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh hahaha nooooo, it would be 15 seconds, and it would start with a sigh and deep, troubled breathing noises, a finger tapping the mic and someone saying “is this thing on” before the entirely useless comment even starts.

    • fluxion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      Obviously they should be using syntactically correct JavaDoc format here so the voice messages can be converted to HTML

  • tetrahedron@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am deaf. i already struggle with keeping up with subtitles on tutorial videos of some obscure stuff that has little to no docs. Kindly return this idea to a void function instead and try not to catch the erroneous thread with these satanic proposals.

  • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah yes, source code files that aren’t plain text and can only be opened by certain editors, exactly what the software industry needs

  • aname@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In reality, an editor could have speech-to-text and it would transcribe the spoken comment into a comment with some tag to indicate it was a spoken comment. Then when an editor encounters such a comment, it would read it out using text-to-speech. For example

    // transcript: Holy fuck what is wrong with this stupid code‽ for fucks sake! *inaudible* I've spent hours on this. I'm going to... nevermind it was a semicolon. Undo comment. Remove comment. Cancel comment.
    
  • bort@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    why use a resource folder for it, when you can embed a base64 encoding directly into the source file?

  • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fantastic idea but I don’t think it goes far enough. Why stop at comments? I want to be able to write whole functions and classes like that!