• Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    The Space Shuttle Challenger has entered the chat.

    Not sure anyone would sign off on sending potential dirty bombs into space.

    A few years back people were floating the idea of sending up orbital solar farms that would collect power and beam it to the surface.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not sure anyone would sign off on sending potential dirty bombs into space.

      At least not anymore… We did a successful test of a nuclear powered ramjet in the 60’s with project Neptune. But I guess that was before people were afraid of dirty bombs welded into the shape of cruise missiles.

        • splatt9990@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There was also a plan to explode nuclear bombs on shorelines to create artificial harbors, and of course the infamous Project Orion, a manned interstellar spaceship powered by exploding hydrogen bombs. Doing unhinged shit with nukes was all the rage back then I guess

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            If you haven’t seen it, “The Three Body Problem” is a good series with a lot of wild ideas.

            They use the hydrogen bomb spaceship idea.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Be honest, if you had a lot of nukes lying around, you wouldn’t at least consider nuking the moon?

          Also when you think about it, nuking the Moon is way less insane than nuking the Earth over 2000 times.